Neo-patriarchy and the Problem of the Arab Crisis: A Critical Study on Hisham Sharabi’s Works

Yoyo Yoyo

Abstract


The paper tries to elaborate the ideas of Hisham Sharabi on Neo-patriarchy culture and its relevance to the current situations. He perceived that Neo-patriarchy as one of main causes of the Arab crisis. According to him, the Arab societies in general did not adopt modernism in its real form. Therefore, rather transforming into modern society they turned into “distorted modernism.” The data of this research particularly are Sharabi’s works that were published during 1980s as crucial period of his intellectual journey. The paper found three major conclusions on neo-patriarchy culture postulated by Sharabi: 1) neo-patriarchy culture is the real form of Arab’s failure in transforming its societies into modern one, it reflected such as in authoritarian political system, economic dependent and social-political fragmentation; 2) criticism is pre-conditions for modern Arab societies’ transformation. One of the efforts to achieve real modernism according to Sharabi is to deconstruct some distorted definitions of democracy, civil society, etc., and build fresh meaning of the terms. 


Keywords


Neo-patriarchy, Arab crisis, distorted modernism, Arab criticism

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abu-Rabi, I. M. (2006) Contemporary Islamic Intellectual History: A Theoretical Perspective. Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura.

Abu-Rabiʻ, I. M. (2004) Contemporary Arab thought: studies in post-1967 Arab intellectual history. London: Pluto Press.

Akhavi, S. (1997) ‘The dialectic in contemporary Egyptian social thought: the scripturalist and modernist discourses of Sayyid Qutb and Hasan Hanafi’, International Journal of Middle East Studies. Cambridge University Press, 29(3), pp. 377–401.

Boullata, I. J. (2001) Dekonstruksi Tradisi: Gelegar Pemikiran Arab Islam. Yogyakarta: LKiS.

Boullata, I. J. (2002) Dekonstruksi Tradisi; Gelegar Pemikiran Arab Islam. LKIS PELANGI AKSARA.

Davidson, L. (2005) ‘Remembering Hisham Sharabi (1927--2005)’, Journal of Palestine Studies. [University of California Press, Institute for Palestine Studies], 34(3), pp. 57–64. doi: 10.1525/jps.2005.34.3.57.

Hourani, A. (1962) Arabic Thought in the Liberal. London: Oxford University Press.

Kassab, E. S. (2010) Contemporary Arab thought : cultural critique in comparative perspective. New York: Columbia University Press.

Murphy, C. (2002) Passion for Islam: Shaping the Modern Middle East: The Egyptian Experience. New York: Scribner.

Sharabi, H. (1987) ‘Cultural Critics of Contemporary Arab Society’, Arab Studies Quarterly. Pluto Journals, 9(1), pp. 1–19. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41857915.

Sharabi, H. (1988) Neopatriarchy: A Theory of Distorted Change in Arab Societies. New York: Oxford University Press.

Sharabi, H. (1991) ‘Introduction: Patriarchy and Dependency and the Future of Arab Society’, in The Next Arab Decade: Alternative Futures. London: Mansell Publishing Limited, pp. 1–8.

Sharabi, H. (1992) Neopatriarchy: A theory of distorted change in Arab society. Oxford University Press.

Tamadonfar, M. (no date) ‘No Title’, International Journal of Middle East Studies. Edited by H. Sharabi. Cambridge University Press, 26(1), pp. 170–171.

‘The Life of an Arab Intellectual: Dr. Hisham B. Sharabi, 1927 - 2005 - The Jerusalem Fund’ (no date). Available at: http://www.thejerusalemfund.org/4079/the-life-of-an-arab-intellectual-dr-hisham-b-sharabi-1927-2005 (Accessed: 20 July 2017).

Toensing, C. (2005) ‘Hisham Sharabi’, Middle East Report. Middle East Research and Information Project (MERIP), (234), p. 2. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1559359.

Yoyo, Y. et al. (2012) ‘TREN PEMIKIRAN INTELEKTUAL MUSLIM KONTEMPORER DI TIMUR TENGAH PASCA-DIFITISME 1967’, Kawistara. Graduate School, Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2(3), pp. 225–328.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v6i2.3808

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.