Open Journal Systems

Sekularisme Ataturk: “Madaniyah” atau “Lā Dῑniyah”? (Tipologi Sekularisme Ataturk )

Ahmad Shofi Muhyiddin

Abstract

This article outlines the question whether Ataturk's secularism has the dimension of abolition of religion (lā dῑniyah) as assumed by many people or has the dimension of state domination over religion which is an expression of nationalism? This is because most classical Islamic political thinkers view that the relationship between religion and state is an organic unity, which cannot be separated from one another. The institutional form for the organic relationship arises in the form of a khilafah. These conditions describe the relationship between politics or power and religion as a symbiotic relationship that is mutually beneficial. As Europeans entered the Middle East, modern thoughts in the region also entered, one of which was kemalism. It was with this understanding that Ataturk in Turkey shocked the Islamic political world by displacing the already weak Ottoman Caliphate. The ideology of kemalism is caused by Ataturk actually a nationalist who admires the west, who wants the progress of Islam, therefore, according to him, it needs to be renewed in matters of religion to suit the Turkish soil. Thus, the practice of secularism in Turkey, broadly, belongs to the category of semi-secular practice, or typology of differential secularism, or "madaniyah". Because Ataturk places religion under state power, not abolishing or even destroying religion

Keywords


Secularism, Musthafa Kemal Ataturk, Madaniyah and Lā Dῑniyah

References


Abduh, M. (1933). “al-A’mal al-Kamilah” (jilid 3; tahqiq M. Imarah, Ed.). Cairo.

Al-Halawi, & Abdurrahman, S. bin. (n.d.). al-Ilmaniyah. Riyadh: Dar al-Hijrah.

Ali, M. (1994). Islam dan Sekularisasi di Turki Modern. Jakarta: Djambatan.

Al-Qardhawi, Y. (1997). al-Islam wa al-Ilmaniyah Wajhan li Wajhin. Cairo: Maktabah Wahbah.

Al-Rayes, & Al-Din, D. (1979). al-Nazariyat al-Siyasiyah al-Islamiyah. Cairo: Dar al-Turath.

al-Usyairi, A. (2004). Sejarah Islam. Jakarta: Akbar.

Anwar, M. S. (1989). Kemalisme dan Islam. Ulum Al-Qur’an, 1(3).

Arkoun, M. (1996). al-Almanah wa ad-Din; al-Islam, al-Masihiyah, al-Gharb. Cairo: Dar as-Saqi.

Esposito, J. L. (2001). Ensiklopedi Oxford Dunia Islam Modern. Bandung.

Firmanto, A. (2005). Deislamisasi Politik dan Depolitisasi Islam di Timur Tengah. Studi Perbandingan Pemikiran Sekularisme Kemal Ataturk di Turki dengan Ali Abd ar-Raziq di Mesir. Universitas Indonesia.

Imarah, M. (2003). as-Syari’ah al-Islamiyah wa al-'Ilmaniyah al-Gharbiyah. Cairo: Dar as-Syuruq.

Lapidus, I. M. (2000). Sejarah Sosial Umat Islam (G. A.Mas’adi, Ed.). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Malik, Z. (2004). Rekonstruksi Teori Kekuasaan dalam Perspektif Ali Abd al-Raziq. Harmoni, 3(10).

Mughni, S. (1997). Sejarah Kebudayaan Islam di Turki. Jakarta: Logos.

Nasution, H. (1982). Pembaharuan Dalam Islam, Sejarah Pemikiran dan Gerakan. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.

Nasution, H.-A. A. (1995). Perkembangan Modern dalam Islam. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Partanto, P., & Al-Barry, D. M. (2001). Kamus Ilmiyah Populer. Surabaya: Arkola.

Salim, A. M. (2009). al-Islam al-Aqlani. Cairo: Haiah Mishriyah Ammah.

Sunanto, M. (2007). Sejarah Peradaban Islam Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Toprak, B. (1999). Islam dan Perkembangan Politik di Turki. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Wahbah, M. (2000). Malak al-Haqiqah al-Muthlaqah. Cairo: Haiah Mishriyah Ammah.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.21043/politea.v2i2.5772

How To Cite This :

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 POLITEA