Focus and Scope

Articles to be received and published in the Journal of Arabia must be included in the scope of the field of Arabic Language Education. This journal not only invites scientists, lecturers, and professors from Islamic institutions only, but we invite anyone who will contribute by submitting an article about the study of Arabic Education. Paper which consider the following general topics are invited.

- Arabic education

- Arabic learning innovation

- Arabic language learning strategies

- Arabic Lingusitcs

- Arabic learning Method

Section Policies

Artikel

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Arabia: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab employs a double-blind peer review system, in which the identities of authors and reviewers remain confidential. The review process consists of the following stages:

1. Initial Screening: The editor assesses the manuscript’s alignment with the journal’s focus and scope, author guidelines, and originality requirements.
2. Peer Review: Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are reviewed by at least two reviewers based on novelty, theoretical framework, methodology, analysis, scholarly contribution, and relevance to Arabic language education.
3. Editorial Decision: Based on the reviewers’ recommendations, the editor decides whether the manuscript is accepted, requires minor revisions, requires major revisions, or is rejected.
4. Revision and Final Decision: Authors revise their manuscripts in response to reviewers’ comments. Further review may be conducted when necessary, while the final decision rests with the editor.

Publication Frequency

Journal of Arabia rises twice a year. Each issue number (issue) amounts to a minimum of ten (10) the title

Open Access Policy

All information and articles contained in this journal site are open access for educational, research and library purposes 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS and CLOCKSS systems to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries. It permits these libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. Furthermore, all published articles are securely stored in the institutional repository of UIN Sunan Kudus to ensure long-term digital preservation.

Publication Ethics

Publication of articles in peer review journals is an important model for our journals. It is necessary to agree on the expected ethical standards of conduct for all parties involved in publishing actions: authors, journal editors, best-of-breed partners and publishers.

Publication Decision

The editor is responsible for deciding which articles submitted to the journal should be published or not. The editor refers to the editorial board's policy of the journal and is limited by legal provisions, such as defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor can talk to other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair Play

Editors in evaluating script content based on their intellectual views irrespective of race, sex, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship or political philosophy of the author.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff should not disclose any information about the script to anyone other than the author, bestarians or reviewers, other editorial advisers, and publishers.

Any manuscript received by a reviewer or a bestari partner shall be treated as a confidential document. They may not be displayed or discussed with others except as authorized by the editors.

Conflict of Interest

Unpublished material in a submitted manuscript should not be used in the research editors themselves without the written consent of the author.

Confidential information or ideas obtained through peer review should be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider scripts in which they have a competitive, collaborative, or other conflictive interest conflict with any of the authors, companies or institutions associated with the paper.

The reviewer's job

Provide feedback on Editorial team decisions

Peer review helps editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communications with authors can also assist authors in improving the articles they create.

Speed

Each selected partner who feels qualified to review the manuscript provided by the editor or out of his or her intellectual competence must immediately refuse and not review the process.

Standards of Objectivity

The review process should be done objectively. The writer's personal criticism is inappropriate. Reviewers must provide their views clearly and accompanied by supporting arguments.

Source Statement

Reviewers shall identify other relevant works that have not been quoted by the author. Any statement which results from observations, derivations, or arguments previously reported shall be accompanied by relevant quotations. The best partner or reviewer should also consider the substantial similarity or overlap between the text being considered and other published papers.

Appropriate recognition of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of their research.

 Author's Duties

Reporting Standards

The author of the original research report must present an accurate report of the research and study conducted. The data taken should be accurately written in the research report. Manuscript A should be detailed and have sufficient referrals to enable others to refer well. A fraudulent or intentionally inaccurate report is unethical and unacceptable behavior.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors must make sure that they have written the original work entirely, and if the author has used the work and / or the words of others then they are obliged to mengekitnya correctly according to the rules that apply.

A writer should not publish a script that describes essentially the same research in more than one major journal or publication. Sending the same script to more than one journal at the same time is unethical and unethical publishing behavior.

Script Authorship

Authors should be limited to those who have contributed significantly to the conception, design, implementation, or interpretation of reported research. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they must be recognized or registered as contributors.

Suitable authors should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and other authors are included in the manuscript, and all authors must have seen and approved the final version of the manuscript and have agreed to be published.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have an unusual danger inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify this in the manuscript.

A fundamental mistake in published works

When an author discovers significant errors or inaccuracies in his / her own published work, it is the duty of the authors to promptly notify the journal or publisher editors and work closely with editors to retract or correct the manuscript.

Plagiarism Check

Arabia use Vipper Check Plagiarism

Authorship Criteria

Arabia: Pendidikan Bahasa Arab recognizes authorship as a form of academic responsibility for published scholarly work. Each author must meet the following criteria:

1. Substantial Contribution: Make a significant contribution to the conception or design of the research, data collection, analysis or interpretation, or development of the theoretical framework.
2. Manuscript Preparation: Participate in drafting the manuscript or critically revising it for important intellectual content.
3. Final Approval: Approve the final version of the manuscript before submission for publication.
4. Accountability: Take responsibility for their contributions and help ensure the accuracy and integrity of the scholarly work.

Individuals who contribute to the research but do not meet the authorship criteria may be acknowledged in the acknowledgments section with their consent.

1. Corresponding Author Responsibilities

The corresponding author is responsible for:

• Ensuring that all listed authors meet the authorship criteria and have approved the final manuscript and its submission.
• Providing accurate information about authors, affiliations, and individual contributions.
• Communicating editorial decisions and revision requests to all co-authors.
• Disclosing relevant conflicts of interest, funding sources, and ethical approvals.
• Responding to communications from the editorial team.

2. Authorship Order and Changes

The order of authors must reflect their contributions and be agreed upon by all authors before submission. Any changes, including adding, removing, or reordering authors after submission, must be supported by a clear justification and written consent from all authors concerned, including those being added or removed. Such changes require editorial approval.

3. Contributions That Do Not Qualify for Authorship

Administrative support, general supervision, funding acquisition alone, language editing, or data collection without substantial intellectual contribution do not automatically qualify an individual for authorship. Such contributions may be acknowledged with the consent of the individuals concerned.

4. Authorship Misconduct

Listing individuals who do not meet the authorship criteria, omitting eligible contributors, and practices such as gift authorship, guest authorship, and ghost authorship constitute violations of authorship ethics. The journal reserves the right to investigate suspected misconduct and take appropriate action in accordance with its publication ethics policies.

5. Use of Artificial Intelligence

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools, including generative AI, cannot be listed as authors because they cannot assume academic responsibility or accountability. Authors who use AI in manuscript preparation remain responsible for the accuracy, originality, integrity, and proper citation of their work and must disclose AI use in accordance with the journal's policies.

Types of Manuscripts

Arabia: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab accepts scholarly manuscripts focusing on Arabic language education and learning, including:

1. Original Research Articles Articles reporting empirical research using qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods approaches relevant to Arabic language education.
2. Literature Review Articles Articles that critically and systematically examine, analyze, and synthesize literature related to Arabic language education.
3. Theoretical and Conceptual Articles Articles discussing theories, concepts, and the development of scholarly perspectives in Arabic linguistics, Arabic language education, and learning.
4. Learning Innovation and Method Articles Articles addressing innovations, strategies, methods, instructional media, and technologies in Arabic language learning.

General Requirements

Allegations of Research Misconduct

Arabia: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab is committed to maintaining academic integrity, research transparency, and publication ethics. The journal handles all allegations of research misconduct objectively, fairly, and confidentially.

Research misconduct includes plagiarism, data fabrication or falsification, duplicate publication, inappropriate authorship practices, citation manipulation, and other violations of research and publication ethics.

1. Reporting and Investigation

Authors, reviewers, editors, readers, and other parties may report suspected misconduct to the editorial team by providing a clear explanation and relevant supporting evidence. The editor conducts an initial assessment, seeks clarification from the parties concerned, and, when necessary, consults relevant experts or institutions. Each allegation is assessed based on the available evidence, without presuming that misconduct has occurred before the investigation is completed.

2. Confidentiality and Fairness

The journal maintains confidentiality throughout the investigation and protects individuals who report concerns in good faith, to the extent possible. All parties are given a fair opportunity to provide explanations. If an allegation involves an editor or reviewer, the case is referred to a competent independent party.

3. Editorial Actions

Based on the investigation findings, the journal may request clarification or corrections, reject a manuscript, publish a correction or an expression of concern, retract a published article, or report the case to the relevant institution when necessary. Actions are determined proportionately according to the severity of the misconduct and the available evidence.

4. Appeals and Ethical Commitment

Parties affected by editorial decisions may submit a written appeal with relevant reasons and supporting evidence. The journal reviews appeals objectively while maintaining the confidentiality of the parties concerned.

Post-Publication Discussion

Arabia: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab welcomes scholarly discussions, academic comments, and critical responses to previously published articles. This forum aims to encourage academic dialogue and advance knowledge and practices in Arabic language education.

Discussions may address theories, research methodologies, empirical findings, teaching innovations, Arabic language skills development, Arabic linguistics, teaching materials, learning media, assessment, and contemporary issues in Arabic language education.

Corrections and Retractions

Arabia: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab is committed to maintaining the accuracy, integrity, and credibility of scholarly publications. The journal adheres to publication ethics principles in handling corrections and retractions of published articles.

1. Corrections

Corrections may be issued when errors are identified in a published article that affect its accuracy or clarity but do not alter its main findings or conclusions. Requests for corrections may be submitted by authors or other parties with relevant supporting evidence.

Correction Submission Procedure:

1. The applicant submits a written request to the editorial team through the journal’s official email, including the article title, author names, DOI or article link, and a description of the identified errors.
2. The applicant provides supporting evidence and proposed revisions.
3. The editorial team reviews the request and may seek clarification from the authors or other relevant parties.
4. Based on the review, the editorial team determines whether a correction should be issued.
5. Approved corrections will be published transparently and linked to the original article.

2. Retractions

Retraction may be considered when a published article is found to contain serious violations that undermine the integrity or reliability of its research findings. These may include plagiarism, data fabrication or falsification, fundamental methodological errors, duplicate publication, or research ethics violations.

3. Editorial Procedures and Responsibilities

The editorial team examines the available evidence, requests clarification from the authors or relevant parties when necessary, and determines the appropriate action, which may include a correction, retraction, or expression of concern. All decisions are made objectively, fairly, and in accordance with publication ethics principles.

Top