Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Articles to be received and published in the Journal ELEMENTARY should be included in the scope of science education Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (MI)


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

The reviewer receives a double-blind review of the editor's editor or editorial secretariat, and is entitled to reject the manuscript if the manuscript reviewed is inconsistent with his field of expertise.


Publication Frequency

Users can register independently by choosing roles as readers, authors, and / or reviewers. After successful registration, the editorial secretariat will clarify again the data of users who have registered on the journal site.


Open Access Policy

Elementary Journal provides open acces journals that can be used and utilized by all readers, especially on the field of study science education Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Through open access it is expected that Elementary Journal can provide scientific transfer and knowledge globally.


Publication Ethic

Publication of articles in peer review journals is an important model for our journals. It is necessary to agree on the expected ethical standards of conduct for all parties involved in the act of publishing: authors, journal editors, bestarial partners and publishers. The Publication Decision Editor is responsible for deciding which articles submitted to the journal should be published or not. Editor refers to the editorial board of the journal policy and is limited by legal provisions, such as defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor can talk to other editors or reviewers in making this decision. Fair Play Editors in evaluating script content based on their intellectual views irrespective of race, sex, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, nationality, Or the author's political philosophy. The Confidentiality of the Editor and any editorial staff shall not disclose any information about the manuscript to anyone other than the author, best partner or reviewer, other editorial advisors, and publishers. Any manuscript received by a reviewer or a bestari partner should be treated as a confidential document. They may not be displayed or discussed with others except as authorized by the editors. Conflict of Interest Unpublished material in a submitted manuscript shall not be used in the research of its own editor without the written consent of the author. Confidential information or ideas obtained through peer review should be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider scripts in which they have a competitive, collaborative, or other conflict of interest with any of the authors, companies, or institutions associated with the paper. Traveler's Tasks Provide feedback on team decisions Editorial Peer review helps editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communication with authors can also assist authors in improving the articles they create. Speed Every well-chosen partner who feels qualified to review the manuscript provided by the editor or out of his or her intellectual competence must immediately refuse and not review the process. Standards of Objectivity The process of reviewing the manuscript should be done objectively. The writer's personal criticism is inappropriate. Reviewers must provide their views clearly and accompanied by supporting arguments. The reviewer's Source Report must identify other relevant works that have not been quoted by the author. Any statement which results from observations, derivations, or arguments previously reported shall be accompanied by relevant quotations. The best partner or reviewer should also consider the substantial similarity or overlap between the text being considered and other published papers. Appropriate recognition of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of their research. Task Writer Reporting Standards The author of the original research report must present an accurate report of the research and studies undertaken. The data taken should be accurately written in the research report. Manuscript A should be detailed and have sufficient referrals to enable others to refer well. A fraudulent or intentionally inaccurate report is unethical and unacceptable behavior. Originality and Plagiarism The authors must make sure that they have written the original work entirely, and if the author has used the works and / or the words of others then they are obliged to mengekitnya correctly according to the rules that apply. A writer should not publish a script that describes essentially the same research in more than one major journal or publication. Sending the same script to more than one journal at the same time is unethical and unethical publishing behavior. Authorship of Authorship Text should be limited to those who have contributed significantly to the conception, design, implementation, or interpretation of reported research. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where others have participated in certain substantive aspects of a research project, they must be recognized or registered as contributors. Appropriate authors should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and other authors are included in the manuscript, and all authors must have seen and approved the final version of the manuscript and have agreed to be published. Hazards and Humans or Subject Animals If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have an unusual danger inherent in their use, The author must clearly identify this in the script. Fundamental mistakes in published works When a writer finds significant errors or inaccuracies in his / her own published work, it is the duty of the writer to promptly notify the journal or publisher editor and work with the editor to retract or correct the manuscript.


Plagiarism Check

Elementary use Vipper Check Plagiarism