Effectiveness of Active Debate Method in English Speaking Skills of Students in SMAN 3 Padangsidimpuan

Khairunnisah Nasution, Apriyanti Hasibuan, Happy Sri Rezeki Purba

Abstract


This research aimed are : 1) Knowing the effectiveness of the debate method in improving students' speaking skills in learning English, 2) Knowing the differences in students' speaking skills using the debate method and without using debate method.The data was collected using test, they were pretest and postest. The result of evaluation was analyzed through quantitative. The results showed: There was a significant difference between the speaking skills of students who received speaking learning using the active debate method with students who received speaking learning without using the active debate method The difference in speaking skills is indicated by the results of the posttest t-test of the control group and the posttest of the experimental group, namely the calculation results show that the t count score is greater than the t table score (th: 2.882> tt: 1.994) at the 5% significance level and db 70. The results of the t-test showed that there were differences in the speaking skills of the control group students who received speaking learning without using the active debate method and the experimental group that received speaking learning using the active debate method.

Keywords


Speaking skill, active debate method

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aries Mintaraga. 2002. Buku Panduan Praktis Debat Bahasa Indonesia Format Parlemen Australia. Magelang: Komunitas Debat FPA Regional Jawa

Tengah-DIY.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendidikan Praktik.nYogyakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arsjad, Maidar. G. 1988. Pembinaan Kemampuan Berbicara Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Hall, Dawn. 2011. Debate: Innovative Teaching to Enhance Critical Thinking and Communication Skill in Healthcare Professionals. Internet Jurnal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice Volume 9 Number 3. Disajikan dalam http://ijahsp.nova.edu/articles/Vol9Num3/Hall.htm diakses pada 11 Oktober 2014.

Harmuni. 2009. Strategi dan Model-model Pembelajaran Aktif Menyenangkani. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Tarbiyah UIN Sunan Kalijaga. Hendrikus, Dori Wuwur. 2005. Retorika Terampil Berpidato, Berdiskusi, Berargumentasi, Bernegoisasi. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Hendrik Praja. 2012. Penerapan Teknik Active Debate (Perdebatan Aktif) untuk

Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berbicara: Penelitian Tindakan Kelas terhadap Siswa Kelas XI SMA PGRI I Bandung Tahun Ajaran 2010-2011. Simpulan Hasil Penelitian. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Diambil dari http://repository.upi.edu/10830/7/s_ind_0703790_chapter5.pdf pada 28 Februari 2015.

Nurgiyantoro, Burhan. 2001. Penilaian dalam Pengajaran Bahasa dan Sastra. Yogyakarta: BPFE.2009. Statistik Terapan. Yogyakarta: UGM Press.

Silberman, Melvin L. 2014. Active Learning; 101 Cara Belajar Siswa Aktif. (Alih Bahasa: Raisul Muttaqien). rev.ed. Bandung: Nuansa Cendekia.

Sudaryanto. 2000. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Bahasa Jilid I, Seri Paradigma Penelitian Kuantitatif, Penelitian Kualitatif. Diktat: FBS UNY.

Sugiyono. 2014. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suharsimi Arikunto, et.al. 2012. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Tarigan, Henry Guntur. 2008. Menulis sebagai suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/jetli.v2i2.5739

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0

View JETLI Stats

Flag Counter