Evaluasi Sistem Informasi Pengupahan PT. Tempu Rejo Menggunakan COBIT 5 Domain DSS

Yohana Teresa Sianipar, Novi Wulandari Widiyanti, Aisa Tri Agustini

Abstract


PT. Tempu Rejo is one of the companies in Jember which is engaged in tobacco processing to produce cigarette. PT. Tempu Rejo applying information technology in the daily operation included in its payment information system, such as biometric identifier as a tool of absence and using applications that support payment in the company. In a company that has applied IT in its operation including payment information system should be evaluated. Evaluation is needed in order to make improvements to the company's payment information system. In this research, the information technology governance standard used is COBIT 5 domain Deliver, Service, and Support (DSS), especially DSS01, DSS03, and DSS05. This research used a qualitative approach by using the method of interviewing and observation as data collection techniques. The result of this research shows that Capability Level of DSS01, DSS03, and DSS05 process are at level 3 (established process). Recommendations are to conduct periodic evaluations to improve performance and create a complete Standard Operational Procedure (SOP) related to the company's payment information system.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Erika, N., Megawaty, & Sauda, S. (2017). Implementasi Framework COBIT 5 dalam Evaluasi Sistem Informasi Manajemen Rumah Sakit (SIMRS) di Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Kabupaten Lahat. Jurnal Teknik Informatika Februari 2017.

Hendarti, H., Husni, S. H., & Tandra, T. W. (2010). Evaluasi Pengendalian Sistem Informasi Persediaan Pada CV. XYZ. Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi 2010 (SNATI 2010) Yogyakarta p. 105-111.

Husein, F. & Wibowo. (2002). Sistem Informasi Manajemen. Yogyakarta: AMP YKPN.

Indrianto, N. & Supomo, B. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis. Yogyakarta: BPFEE.

ISACA. (2013). “COBIT® Assessment Programme (PAM) Tool Kit: Using COBIT® 5”, Available: http://www.isaca.org/cobit.

IT Governance Institute. (2005). COBIT 4.0: Control Objectives, Management Guidelines, Maturity Models.

Krismiaji. (2010). Sistem Informasi Akuntansi. Edisi Ketiga. Yogyakarta: UPP-STIM YKPN.

Moleong, Lexy J. (2004). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyadi. (2008). Sistem Akuntansi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Romney, M. B. Dan P. J. Steinbart. (2014). Accounting Information Systems. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc. Terjemahan oleh Safira, K. S. N. dan N. Puspitasari. 2015. Sistem Informasi Akuntansi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Sabarguna, B. (2003). Sistem Informasi Manajemen Rumah Sakit. Yogyakarta.

Silalahi, U. (2006). Metode Penelitian Sosial. Bandung: Unpar Press.

Supandi. (1999). Manajemen Perawatan Industri. Bandung: Ganeca Exact.

Sugiyono. (2014). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Umar, H. (2002). Evaluasi Kinerja Perusahaan. Jakata: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Wibowo, D. P. (2016). Evaluasi Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Penggajian Pada PT. Bank Muamalat Cabang Ciledug. Depok: Jurusan Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Gunadarma.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/aktsar.v1i2.5096

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

https://search.crossref.org/?q=aktsar&publication=AKTSAR%3A+Jurnal+Akuntansi+Syariahhttps://scholar.google.co.id/citations?user=LdV3AiwAAAAJ&hl=en&authuser=3