MELUKISKAN AKUNTANSI  DENGAN KUAS INTERPRETIF

Nurhayati Nurhayati

doi:10.21043/bisnis.v3i1.1481

MELUKISKAN AKUNTANSI DENGAN KUAS INTERPRETIF

Nurhayati Nurhayati

Abstract

This study departs from the domination of accounting studies using the paradigm of positivistic methodology. The aim in this study
provides an alternative approach in developing interpretive accounting research. Triyuwono (2013) says there are five paradigms in the social sciences: positivism, interpretivism, criticism postmodernism, and spiritualists. Interpretivis paradigm, critical, postmodernist and spiritualists using qualitative methods, which is the development of positivistic paradigm. This paradigm is not mutually exclusive, ideally an accounting researchers must be able to accept this paradigm, called“multiparadigma” (Triyuwono, 2013). Interpretive considers that truth, reality or real life does not have a one-sided, but it has many facets, can be examined from various viewpoints. Design research in interpretive research, phenomenology, ethnography, ethnometodology, narrative, case studies, and grounded theory.

Keywords

paradigm, accounting, interpretive

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ahrens, T dan Mollona, M (2007) Organisational Control As Cultural Practice - A Shop Floor Ethnography Of A Sheffield Steel Mill

Alvesson, M. dan K. Skoldberg. 2000. Reflexive Methodology. Sage Publication. London.

Basrowi, M dan Soenyono, 2004. Teori Sosial dalam Tiga Paradigma, Yayasan kampusina Surabaya.

Burrel, G and Morgan G. 1979. Sociological Paradigms and organizational Analysis : Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life. London: Heinemann

Behling, Orlando, 1980.The Case For The Natural Science Model For Research In Organizational Behavior And Organization, Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review (pre-1986); Oct 1980; 5, 000004; ProQuest pg. 483.

Coulon, Alain, 2008. Etnometodologi, Lengge, Yogyakarta.

Churchill Jr, Christian J., (2005), Ethnography as a translation, Qualitative Sociology, Vol. 28. No. 1. Spring.

Dahlan., Moh. 2009. Relasi Sains Modern dan Sains Islam Suatu Upaya Pencarian Paradigma Baru. Volume 12 No. 2

Denzin, N.K. 1989. Interpretive Interactionism. Applied Sosial Research Methods Series Vol. 16. Sage Publications, California.

Denzin, N.K. dan Lincoln, Y.S.2009. Handbook of Qualitatif Research.Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.

Dey, Collins,. (2004), Social Accounting at Traidcraft PLC: An Ethnographic Study of A Struggle for The Meaning of Fair Trade.

Farnetti, Frederica., and Guthrie, James., (2009) Sustainnability Reporting by Australian Public Sector Oreganization : Why They Report ? Accounting Forum 33, pp. 89-98.

Georgakopoulos, G and Thompson, I, (2004), Organic Salmon Farming : Risk Perception, Decision, Heuristic and the Absence of Environmental Accounting, Fourth Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference, 4 to 6 July 2004, Singapore.

Giddens,A. 2003. The Constitution of Society; TeoriStrukturasi UntukAnalisisSosial. Penerbit Pedati, Pasuruan. Diterjemahkandarijudulasli “The Constitution of Society: The Outline of the Theory of Structuration”, Polity Press Cambridge – UK, 1995.

Guthrie, James., Cuganesan, Suresh., and Ward, Leanne,. (2008). Industry Specific Social and Environmental Reporting: The Australian Food and Beverage Industry, Accounting Forum 32, pp 1-15

Kristiyanto, Eddy. 2004. Reformasi dari Dalam. Kanisius,Yogyakarta

Kuswarno, Engkus, 2009. Fenomenologi, Konsepsi, Pedoman, dan Contoh Penelitian, Penerbit Widya Padjadjaran, Bandung.

Ludigdo, 2006.Pemahaman Strukturasi Atas Praktik Etika di Sebuah Kantor Akuntan Publik, Disertasi, tidak dipublikasikan, Universitas Brawijaya Malang

Ludigdo, 2007. Paradoks Etika Akuntan, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.

Neuman, W.L. 2000. Social Research Methods; Qualitative and Quantitative Approach. A Pearson Eduacation Company, USA.

O’Collins, Gerald dan G. Farrugia, Edward. 1996. Kamus Teologi, Entri “Nominalisme” Kanisius, Yogyakarta.

Raar, Jean.. (2004), Environmental and Social Responsibility: A Normative Financial reporting Concept, Accepted for Presentation at the Fourth Asia Pacific Interdisiplinary research in Accounting Conference, 4-6 July 2004 in Singapore.

Roslender, Robin, 1992. Sociological Perspectives on Modern Accountancy, Routledge, London Sanders.

Patricia (1982). Phenomenology A New Way of Viewing Oragnizational Research, Academy management Review, Vo. 7, No. 3. pp. 353-360

Solomon, Jill Frances and Thomson, Ian (2009). Satanic Mills : An Illustration of Victorian External Environtmental Accounting, Accounting Forum 33, pp. 74-87

Spradley, J.P. 1997. Metode Etnografi. Penerbit PT Tiara Wacana, Yogyakarta. Diterjemahkan dari judul asli The Ethnographic Interview.

Suriasumantri, J. S. 1993. Filsafat Ilmu Sebuah Pengantar Populer: Jakarta

Knuuttila,MLK, et al, 2008. Straddling Between Paradigms: A Naturalistic Philosophical Case Study On Interpretive Research In Management Accounting. Accounting Orgaiztionations, and Society, Vol 33 (2008) 267–291

Triyuwono, Iwan. 2007. Mengangkat “Sing Liyan” untuk Formulasi Nilai Tambah Syariah. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma. (Volume 1, Nomor 1, April 2010, 161-162).

Triyuwono, Iwan , 2013. Makrifat Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Dan Kuantitatif Untuk Pengembangan Disiplin Akuntansi, Makalah ini diseminarkan dalam acara Simposium Nasional Akuntansi ke-16 di Manado pada

tanggal 25-27 September 2013.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/bisnis.v3i1.1481