Analisis Argumentasi dalam Isu Sosiosaintifik Siswa SMP
Abstract
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into Argumentation: Developments in The Application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for Studying Science Discourse. Science Education, 88, 915-933.
Gayford, C. (2002). Controversial Environmental Issues:A Case Study for Professional Development of Science Teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 24 (11), 1191-1200.
Hall, D. (2011). Debate: Innovative Teaching to Enhance Critical Thinking and Communication Skills in Healthcare Professionals. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Science and Practice 9(3) Article 7
Inch, E. S. (2006). Critical Thinking and Communication: The use of Reason in Argument. USA: Pearson
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodrigues, A. B., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). “Doing the lesson” or “Doing science”: Argument in High School Genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757-792.
Kelly, G. J., Druker, S., & Chen, C. (1998). Students’ reasoning about Electricity: Combining Performance Assessment with Argumentation Analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 20(7), 849-871.
Kelly, G. J., & Takao, A. (2002) Epistemic Levels in Argument: An Analiysis of University oceanography students’ use of evidence in writing. Science Education, 86(3), 314-342.
Kolsto, S. D. (2001). Scientific Literacy for Citizenship: Tools for Dealing with The Science Dimension of Controversial Socioscientific Issues. Science Education, 85, 291-310
Lang, M. & Olson, J. (2000). Integrated Science Teaching as a Challenge for Teachers to Develop New Conceptual Structures. Research in Science Education, 30 (2), 213-224.
Lawson, A. (2003). The Nature and Development of Hypothetico-Deductive Argumentation with Implication for Science Learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1378-1408.
Makhene, A. (2017), Argumentation: A Methodology to Facilitate Critical Thinking International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship
Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse. Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2015). P21 Framework Definition. Los Angeles: The Partnership for 21st Century Learning
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 21 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Isi Kurikulum 2013 Revisi untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. 2016. Jakarta.
Resnick, L. B., Salmon, M., Zeitz, C. M., Wathen, S. H., & Hollowchack, M. (1993). Reasoning in Cnversation. Cognition & Instruction., 11(3&4), 347-364
Rivard, L. P., & Straw, S. B. (2000). The Effect of Talk and Writing on Learning Science: An Exploratory Study. Science Edication, 84, 566-593
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal Reasoning Regarding Socioscientific Issues: A Critical Review of Research. Journal of Research in Science and Teaching, 41 (5), 513-536
Sadler, T. D. & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). The Morality of Socioscientific Issued: Construal and Resolution of Genetic Engineering Dilemmas. Science Education, 88, 4-27
Sadler, T.D., Chambers, F. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Student Conceptualisation of The Nature of Science in Respone to a Sociosaintific Issues. International Journal of Science Education. 26 (4), 387-410
Sadler, T. D. & Donnelly, L. A. (2006). Socioscientific Argumentation. The Effects of Content Knowledge and Morality. International journal of Science Education, 28 (12), 1463-1488
Sampson, V. & Clark, D. (2006). Assessment of Argument in Science Education: A Critical Review of the Literature. In Proceedings of international Conference of the Learning Sciences 2006, Bloomington, IN. (pp. 655-661)
Sandoval, W. (2003). Conceptual and Epistemic Aspects of Students’ scientific Explanation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 5-51.
Sandoval, W. & Millwood, K. (2005). The Quality of Students use of Evidence in Written Scientific Explanation. Cognition & Instruction, 23(1), 23-55.
Sanders, J.A., Wiseman, R.L., and Gass, R.H. (1994). Does teaching argumentation facilitate critical thinking? Communication Reports 7:1 p 27-35.
Takao, A., & Kelly, G. (2003). Assessment of Evidence in University Students’ scientific Writing. Science & Education, 12(4), 341-363.
Wallace, C. S., Hand, B., & Prain, V. (2004). Writing and Learning in The Science Classroom. Dordecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Zohar A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering Students’ Knowledge and Argumentation Skills Trough Dillemas in Human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35-62.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v1i1.3868
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.