Interpretivisme: Sebuah Perspekstif yang Digunakan dalam Pengembangan Ilmu Akuntansi

Jurana Jurana

Abstract


Interpretivism: a perspective that is used in the development of accounting This research aims to prove that the interpretive is a perspective can be used in the development of science accounting. This research is librarian study which collect data by using written materials. The interpretive paradigm is one of the paradigms used to search for the truth of science or developing science through the meaning of reality that is around humans. On the basis of the results of that meaning, people can gain knowledge on the existing realities and develop knowledge based on that reality. Therefore, to seek the truth of science, especially the science of accounting or develop science can be examined using interpreatif paradigm.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahrens, T., & Mollona, M. (2007) . Organisational Control As Cultural Practice (Penerjemah, Trans.) A ShopFloor Ethnography Of A Sheffield Steel Mill.

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian (Penerjemah, Trans.). 2010: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life. (Penerjemah, Trans.). London: Heinemann Educational Books.

Chairiri, A. (2009). Landasan Filsafat dan Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Paper presented at the Workshop Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif.

Chan, S. H. (2006). Commitment of Members of Human Development Organization. The Journal of Management Development, 25 (3), 249-268.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitaive Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. (Penerjemah, Trans.). Sage.

Denzim, N., S, Y., & Lincoln. (2009). Handbook of Qualitative Research (Penerjemah, Trans.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Dey, & Collins. (2004). Social Accounting at Traidcraft PLC: An Ethnographic Study of A Struggle for The Meaning of Fair Trade (Penerjemah, Trans.).

Efferin. (2004). Metode Penelitian untuk Akuntansi (Penerjemah, Trans.). Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.

Efferin, S., & T, H. (2007). Management control, culture and ethnicity in a Chinese Indonesian company. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32 (3), 223-262.

Gadamer, & Hans-Georg. (1976). Philosophical Hermenutics (Penerjemah, Trans.). Los Angeles: University of California.

Georgakopoulos, G., & Thompson. (2004). Organic Salmon Farming : Risk Perception, Decision, Heuristic and the Absence of Environmental Accounting. Paper presented at the Fourth Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference.

Ghozali, I., & Chairiri, A. (2007). Teori Akuntansi (Penerjemah, Trans.). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory (Penerjemah, Trans.). Chicago: Aldine.

Knuuttila. (2008). Straddling Between Paradigms: A Naturalistic Philosophical Case Study On Interpretive Research In Management Accounting. Accounting Orgaiztionations, and Society, 33 267-291.

Kuhn, & Thomas, S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Penerjemah, Trans. Vol. II). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kuswarno, E. (2009). Fenomenologi, Konsepsi, Pedoman, dan Contoh Penelitian (Penerjemah, Trans.). Bandung: Penerbit Widya Padjadjaran.

Ludigdo, U. (2006). Pemahaman Strukturasi Atas Praktik Etika di Sebuah Kantor Akuntan Publik. Brawijaya University, Malang.

Ludigdo, U. (2007). Paradoks Etika Akuntan (Penerjemah, Trans.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Ludigdo, U. (2013). Asumsi Dasar Paradigma Interpretif. Makalah Accounting Research Training Series, 4,

Mardalis. (1999). Metode Penelitian (Penerjemah, Trans.). Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Miller, J. P. (2002). Cerdas di Kelas Sekolah Kepribadian. (Penerjemah, Trans.). Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana

Nelson, C., Treichler, P. A., & Grossberg, L. (1992). Culture Studies (Penerjemah, Trans.). New York: Routledge.

Neuman, W. L. (1997). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches in Social Works (Penerjemah, Trans.). New York: Columbia University.

Pelly, Usman, & Menanti, A. (1994). Teori - Teori Sosial Budaya (Penerjemah, Trans.). Jakarta: Dirjen Dikti.

Riharjo, & Budi, I. (2011). Memahami Paradigma Penelitian Non Positivisme Dan Implikasinya Dalam Penelitian Akuntansi. Jurnal Akuntansi, Manajemen Bisnis Dan Sektor Publik (JAMBSP) 8(1).

Ryan, Bob, Scapens, & Theobald. (2002). Research Method and Methodology in Finance and Accounting. (Penerjemah, Trans.) Cengage Learning. Singapore: Seng Lee Press.

Spradley, & James, P. (1997). Metode Etnografi (Penerjemah, Trans.). Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana Yogya.

Subagyo, A. (1999). Studi Kelayakan: Teori dan Aplikasi (Penerjemah, Trans.). Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/aktsar.v2i1.4728

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.