Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Articles to be received and published in the Journal AT-TABSYIR: Journal of Islamic Broadcasting Communications must be included in the scope of the field of Islamic Broadcasting Communication

Section Policies

Artikel

  • Checked Open Submissions
  • Checked Indexed
  • Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Reviewers receive double-blind review manuscripts from section editors or editorial secretariats, and are entitled to reject the manuscript if the manuscript reviewed does not match the field of scholarship

Publication Frequency

Journal of AT-TABSYIR Journal of Islamic Broadcasting Communications is published twice a year (June and December). Every issue number (issue) amounts to at least ten (10) articles titles.

Open Access Policy

All information and articles contained in this journal site are open access for educational, research and library purposes [see also Copyright Notice].

Plagiarism Check

AT-TABSYIR Journal of Islamic Broadcasting Communications uses Viper to check posts before they are published

Publication Fee

AT-TABSYIR Journal of Islamic Broadcasting Communications does not receive any fees for any article publishing process

Editorial Policies

Publication of articles in peer review journals is an important model for our journals. It is necessary to agree on the expected ethical standards of conduct for all parties involved in the act of publishing: authors, journal editors, bestarial partners and publishers.

Publication Decision

The editor is responsible for deciding which articles submitted to the journal should be published or not. Editor refers to the editorial board of the journal policy and is limited by legal provisions, such as defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor can talk to other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair Play

Editors in evaluating script content based on their intellectual views irrespective of race, sex, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship or political philosophy of the author.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff should not disclose any information about the manuscript to anyone other than the author, best partner or reviewer, other editorial advisors, and publishers.

Any manuscript received by a reviewer or a bestari partner shall be treated as a confidential document. They may not be displayed or discussed with others except as authorized by the editors.

Conflict of Interest

Unpublished material in a submitted manuscript should not be used in the research editors themselves without the written consent of the author.

Confidential information or ideas obtained through peer review should be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider scripts in which they have a competitive, collaborative, or other conflict of interest with any of the authors, companies, or institutions associated with the paper.

The reviewer's job

Provide feedback on Editorial team decisions

Peer review helps editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communications with authors can also assist authors in improving the articles they create.

Speed

Each selected partner who feels qualified to review the manuscript provided by the editor or out of his or her intellectual competence must immediately refuse and not conduct the review process.

Standards of Objectivity

The review process should be done objectively. The writer's personal criticism is inappropriate. Reviewers must provide their views clearly and accompanied by supporting arguments.

Source Statement

Reviewers shall identify other relevant works that have not been quoted by the author. Any statement which results from observations, derivations, or arguments previously reported shall be accompanied by relevant quotations. The best partner or reviewer should also consider the substantial similarity or overlap between the text being considered and other published papers.

Appropriate recognition of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of their research.

 Author's Duties

Reporting Standards

The author of the original research report must present an accurate report of the research and study conducted. The data taken should be accurately written in the research report. Manuscript A should be detailed and have sufficient referrals to enable others to refer well. A fraudulent or intentionally inaccurate report is unethical and unacceptable behavior.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and / or words of others then they shall mengukitnya correctly according to the rules.

A writer should not publish a script that describes essentially the same research in more than one major journal or publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently is unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Script Authorship

Authors should be limited to those who have contributed significantly to the conception, design, implementation, or interpretation of reported research. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where others have participated in certain substantive aspects of a research project, they must be recognized or registered as contributors.

Suitable authors should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and other authors are included in the manuscript, and all authors must have seen and approved the final version of the manuscript and have agreed to be published.

Hazard and Human or Animal Subject

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have an unusual danger inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify this in the manuscript.

A fundamental mistake in published works

When an author discovers significant errors or inaccuracies in his / her own published work, it is the duty of the authors to promptly notify the journal or publisher editors and work closely with editors to retract or correct the manuscript

Publication Ethics

AT-TABSYIR: Journal of Islamic Broadcasting Communications (p-ISSN: 2338-8544 e-ISSN: 2477-2046) is a Journal containing actual issues related to Islamic, communication and social preaching produced by academics through various literature studies (Library research) or field study to then be published in the form of Scientific Journals. The journal AT-TABSYIR is published twice a year (every six months, published in June and December) by the Islamic Broadcasting Communication Studies Program Department of Communication and Communication of Holy Sanity.

Article publication in peer review journal is an important model for our journal. It is necessary to agree on the expected ethical standards of standards for all parties involved in the act of publishing: authors, journal editors, smart partners and publishers.
Ethics of Publishing

Publishing articles in the Journal AT-TABSYIR is a network of coherent and respected knowledge. This is a direct reflection of the quality of work of authors and institutions that support them. The articles reviewed support and contain scientific methods. Therefore, it is important to agree on the expected ethical standards of standards for all parties involved in the publication, namely: authors, journalists, smart partners, publishers and the public.

The AT-TABSYIR Journal Manager has full preference in accepting, selecting, processing and publishing articles into a form of journal with the applicable rules

 

Responsibilities of the Editor Team

Publishing Decisions

The editor of AT-TABSYIR is responsible for deciding which articles that have fit the theme and submitted must be published. The validation of the work and its meanings for researchers and readers should always push the decision. Editors can be guided by the policy of the journal editorial board and restricted by legal provisions as to be upheld against defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. Editors may consult other editors or team of assessors in making this decision.

Fair Treatment

Editors always assess scripts based on their intellectual content without discriminating race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin or nationality of authors.

Confidentiality

Editors and editors should not disclose any information that is submitted to anyone other than writers, expert editors, smart partners, and publishers.

Notice and Conflict of Interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in the submitted script should not be used in the research itself without the express written consent of the author.

Reviewer Responsibility

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Smart partner assessment helps editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communication with authors can also help the author refine his writings.

Speed

Any selected assessor who does not meet the qualifications to assess the reported research in a script or finds that the quick review will be unlikely to inform the editor and release him / her from the assessment process.

Confidentiality

Any scripts received for assessments should be treated as confidential documents. The document may not be presented or discussed with others unless authorized by the editor.

Objective Standards

Assessment should be done objectively. Criticism is personal to the author is not justified. Valuers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Respect of Resources

The assessor must identify the relevant published work that the author does not cite. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument has been previously reported must be accompanied by relevant citations. An assessor should also ask the editor to pay attention to the similarity or overlap between the assessed script and other published writings.

Notice and Conflict of Interest

The confidential information or opinions obtained through the assessment of the best partner must be kept confidential and should not be used for personal gain. Assessors are not permitted to consider the script in which they have a conflict of interest originating from a relationship or relationship of competition, cooperation or otherwise with any writer, company, or agency related to the writings.